Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160316
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 05 '17 at 23:26
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 128
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 202
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.78% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 4.25
4% 4.35 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.71 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.78%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Drevo X1 120GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.9% Very good
Read 496
Write 383
Mixed 466
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 4.4
105% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 4.63
54% 122 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
400GB free
Firmware: HP73 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 105
Write 112
Mixed 97.6
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.35
80% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBR2 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
68% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22.1
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 21.1
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $394
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback