Alienware Area-51m

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlienware Area-51m  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware Area-51m
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '20 at 17:08
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 83.5
1-Core 152
2-Core 303
97% 180 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 1,189
106% 894 Pts
64-Core 1,165
72% 1,165 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile)
Dell(1028 08C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.23
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
118% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 159
Parallax 167
129% 161 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 139
Splatting 104
112% 142 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB2T0 2TB
934GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3M2QEXG7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1185 623 757 761 775 767 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,028
Write 2,003
Mixed 1,244
SusWrite 811
340% 1,522 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 67.9
219% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,607
DQ Write 1,423
DQ Mixed 1,515
1,136% 1,515 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 266%
Great: 366%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 01980000830B 99U5663-003.A00G 04CB000002B5 01980000830B 99U5663-003.A00G 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 27
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 25.1
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Area-51m Builds (Compare 547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

System: Alienware Area-51m

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback