Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Memory 50.9 1-Core 34.4 2-Core 58.1 31% 47.8 Pts	4-Core 66.1 8-Core 80.4 9% 73.2 Pts	64-Core 82.9 5% 82.9 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset 33,874 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Legend(17AA 305D) 2.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.46% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 0.58 Parallax 0.59 0% 0.6 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 0.43 0% 0.44 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.46% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 120GB 1,698 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0607A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 166 Write 167 Mixed 142 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 22.3 4K Mixed 11.5 46% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 39 DQ Write 81.4 DQ Mixed 52.9 42% 57.8 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 109%
KINGSTON SA400S3 120GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 111GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 33.5 Write 27.5 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 27.1 40% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 5.6 379% 5.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 175%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	18.8% Very poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 5.9 18% 6.47 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 5.2 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 157 25% 157 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16