Medion Erazer P7643 MD60403

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Medion Erazer P7643 MD60403 (all builds)
Motherboard	Medion D17SHN
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, , 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160721
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 01 '20 at 10:27
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6500U 102,213 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 90.3 2-Core 157 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 242 33% 246 Pts	64-Core 244 15% 244 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1B0A 2286) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8336 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	5.6% Terrible	Lighting 6.47 Reflection 15.6 Parallax 6.59 5% 9.55 fps	MRender 0.14 Gravity 6.07 Splatting 13.7 6% 6.65 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.6% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
S11-256G-PHISON-SSD 256GB 324 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFD00.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 86 49 64 50 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	55.8% Above average	Read 163 Write 75.2 Mixed 325 SusWrite 88 37% 163 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 28.9 115% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 326 DQ Write 72.5 DQ Mixed 43.4 72% 147 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 83%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB 6,695 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 930GB free Firmware: AX1P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 106 107 107 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 101 Write 101 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 106 62% 85.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 61%
Mass Storage Device 16GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 9GB free, PID 127b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 4.8 4.9 4.9 4.9 5.4 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	5.84% Terrible	Read 20.2 Write 4.5 Mixed 7 SusWrite 5.1 10% 9.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.4 70% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.84% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 2x8GB 1,494 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 19.4 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 17.5 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer P7643 MD60403 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer P7643 MD60403

CPU
Core i7-6500UIntelBench 46%, 102,213 samples	1x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	1x

SSD
S11-256G-PHISON-SSD 256GBBench 63%, 324 samples	1x

RAM
HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 27%, 6,821 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16