MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '20 at 07:19
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$81
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 293
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 845
80% 661 Pts
64-Core 969
60% 969 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM13.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,128
Write 1,765
Mixed 520
254% 1,137 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 49.5
209% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 943
DQ Write 527
DQ Mixed 528
448% 666 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 262%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
111GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 446 456 453 465 467 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 370
Write 339
Mixed 380
SusWrite 454
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 39.2
149% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 170
162% 249 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
75GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 142 170 169 169 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 486
Mixed 382
SusWrite 199
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 37.7
139% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 194
192% 305 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$65
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 37.1
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 35.6
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $537
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback