Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200207
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJun 30 '20 at 16:24
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 70.8
1-Core 141
2-Core 270
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 934
86% 717 Pts
64-Core 1,404
87% 1,404 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 3.5
3% 3.98 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 2.83
3% 4.09 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1332 303 305 306 306 307 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,720
Write 1,344
Mixed 500
SusWrite 476
224% 1,010 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 46.2
193% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 1,228
DQ Write 959
DQ Mixed 787
672% 992 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 205%
Great: 236%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
460GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 466 464 463 445 363 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 454
Mixed 423
SusWrite 446
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 54.2
196% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
Generic- Multi-Card 2GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 8.6 7.9 7.8 7.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.08% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 10.5
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 8.9
16% 13 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.9
60% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.08%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.7% Average
MC Read 13
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 14.1
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 9.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $796
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback