Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350 6,654 User benchmarks, average bench 25% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Memory 50.3 1-Core 15.9 2-Core 26.6 23% 30.9 Pts	4-Core 32.5 8-Core 36 4% 34.2 Pts	64-Core 28.8 2% 28.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0520) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 1.38 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.22 fps	MRender 1.24 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.22 1% 1.04 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3265GSX 320GB-$91 6,085 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: GJ002J SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 23 27 30 28 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 42.2 Write 58.3 Mixed 16.3 SusWrite 28.2 26% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.3 70% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JSF25664HZ-1G1F1 Elpida EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 4GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.7% Very poor	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.6 GB/s	SC Read 1.2 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 1.7 5% 1.6 GB/s	Latency 160 25% 160 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
SU 650 120GBAdataBench 56%, 342 samples	1x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	1x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	4x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	3x
M471B2873FHS-CF8 Elpida EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 3GBSamsungBench 15%, 3 samples	2x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28