Sirona CEREC AC Omnicam PC

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Sirona CEREC AC Omnicam PC (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150824
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '20 at 05:12
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Memory 89.7 1-Core 108 2-Core 209 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 395 8-Core 654 64% 524 Pts	64-Core 826 51% 826 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 1850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Lighting 77.3 Reflection 71.1 Parallax 91.5 63% 80 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 76.5 Splatting 57.1 54% 67.5 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 126GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 816 670 669 673 668 671 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 2,270 Write 2,032 Mixed 1,390 SusWrite 695 356% 1,597 MB/s	4K Read 52.8 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 69.2 234% 82 MB/s	DQ Read 699 DQ Write 594 DQ Mixed 646 484% 646 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 215GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,048 Write 5,012 Mixed 4,856 1,112% 4,972 MB/s	4K Read 486 4K Write 238 4K Mixed 297 1,243% 340 MB/s	DQ Read 981 DQ Write 613 DQ Mixed 721 558% 771 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-023.A00G 2x8GB 2,792 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	MC Read 33.8 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 23.4 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 20.7 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CEREC AC Omnicam PC Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

System: Sirona CEREC AC Omnicam PC

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	29x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	11x
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	11x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	24x
RX 470AMD $126Bench 40%, 94,030 samples	6x
RTX 3090-TiNvidiaBench 232%, 16,406 samples	6x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $104Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	10x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	9x
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $130Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	4x

RAM
9905702-017.A00G 4x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 187 samples	7x
F3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 43%, 450 samples	7x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 73%, 838 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16