HP AiO 22-3130xtb DT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP AiO 22-3130xtb DT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B3C
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '20 at 00:29
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 47.1
2-Core 127
47% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 217
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 A330
HP(103C 2B3C) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1501.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 8.88
Parallax 4.34
3% 5.48 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.7
4% 5.31 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1 512GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT04L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 416 409 422 420 421 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 436
Mixed 302
SusWrite 404
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 38.4
119% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 258
215% 311 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 16
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.5
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AiO 22-3130xtb DT PC Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP AiO 22-3130xtb DT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback