| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-R (all builds) |
| Memory | 10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190703 |
| Uptime | 3.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 29 '20 at 19:26 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.7%
Very good
|
73% 129 Pts
|
54% 406 Pts
|
25% 399 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.4%
Above average
|
59% 69.3 fps
|
48% 59 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 64 38 41 33 30 MB/s
|
36.1%
Below average
|
26% 123 MB/s
|
52% 21.8 MB/s
|
37% 89.8 MB/s
|
|
Hds723020ala640 RSD HUA 2TB
565GB free
Firmware: MK7OC790
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 100 104 105 104 105 MB/s
|
61.9%
Good
|
71% 96.9 MB/s
|
169% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$45
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70.6%
Very good
|
72% 25.2 GB/s
|
59% 20.8 GB/s
|
51% 78 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,559 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-R
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $94Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 928x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 375x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 273x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 527x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 340x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 306x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $181 |