Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hardkernel ODROID-H2 (all builds)
Motherboard	HARDKERNEL ODROID-H2
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200427
Uptime	205.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '20 at 16:35
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4115 544 User benchmarks, average bench 34% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Memory 38.8 1-Core 52.1 2-Core 104 37% 65 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 207 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 39%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 727 727 681 738 543 546 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	140% Outstanding	Read 553 Write 519 Mixed 512 SusWrite 660 127% 561 MB/s	4K Read 48.5 4K Write 72.7 4K Mixed 57.9 186% 59.7 MB/s	DQ Read 541 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 490 352% 456 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 355%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x8GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 13.2 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.2 GB/s	Latency 208 19% 208 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4115IntelBench 34%, 544 samples	7x
Celeron J4105IntelBench 36%, 1,216 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	8x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples	2x
TS256GMTE110S 256GBTranscendBench 148%, 4,102 samples	1x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 2x8GBABCDBench 28%, 28 samples	2x
123456789012345678 2x4GBABCDBench 24%, 783 samples	2x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x4GBKingstonBench 82%, 390 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16