Dell Studio XPS 435MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Studio XPS 435MT  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0R849J
Memory20 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 00:51
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3580
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 170
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 434
46% 368 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 66.4
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 83.6
54% 72.2 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 69
Splatting 57.2
53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 42 46 23 12 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.2% Poor
Read 190
Write 36.2
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 32.7
17% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 11.2
49% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 16.2
DQ Write 28.8
DQ Mixed 15.6
14% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 85%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
121GB free
Firmware: 1AA01117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 84 85 88 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 85.5
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
798GB free
Firmware: AX0P2D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 84 86 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 98
Write 97
Mixed 33
SusWrite 85.5
57% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 62%
SAMSUNG SP2504C 250GB
35GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 44 43 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.7% Very poor
Read 45.2
Write 50.5
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 43.7
59% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 26%
SAMSUNG HM321HI 320GB
260GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27% Poor
Read 85.7
Write 53
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 43.8
69% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 12.3
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435MT Builds (Compare 323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 435MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $166
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback