Zotac MEK1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemZotac MEK1  (all builds)
MotherboardZOTAC MEK1
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 28 '20 at 22:48
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 87
1-Core 128
2-Core 244
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 703
68% 559 Pts
64-Core 683
42% 683 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 1424) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.1% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 132
Parallax 112
101% 122 fps
MRender 94.6
Gravity 122
Splatting 102
87% 106 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 230 180 187 172 182 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 451
Write 224
Mixed 204
SusWrite 197
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 27.6
100% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 226
147% 172 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 214%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
807GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 74 48 45 32 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 94.3
Write 56.5
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 47.6
44% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.7
192% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 22.2
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 24.6
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEK1 Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

System: Zotac MEK1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $466
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback