Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	38.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160617
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '20 at 16:29
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 78.1 2-Core 157 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 471 44% 365 Pts	64-Core 471 29% 471 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Lighting 49.7 Reflection 34 Parallax 42.4 40% 42 fps	MRender 48 Gravity 45.2 Splatting 39.7 36% 44.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 7.7 27 20 117 124 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 448 Write 354 Mixed 294 SusWrite 61.5 64% 289 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 20.7 4K Mixed 19.7 59% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 26.4 DQ Mixed 44 39% 62.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 55%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB 11,642 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 87GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 102 103 103 106 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 86.5 Write 88 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 98.3 65% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 75%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150 19,279 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 138GB free Firmware: MS2OA5R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 102 104 103 106 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 133 Write 110 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 98.4 68% 94 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 10GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.4% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 15 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 13.2 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	290x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	229x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	51x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16