Dell OptiPlex 5040

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 5040
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 5040  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '20 at 05:19
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
Socket 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 78
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 384
51% 384 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
PNY(196E 1350) ≥ 4GB; PNY GeForce 1650 Super 4Gb single fan
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.6% Above average
Lighting 78.1
Reflection 73.7
Parallax 77.2
64% 76.3 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 54.7
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 343 373 386 383 370 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 403
Write 404
Mixed 287
SusWrite 352
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 37.5
130% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 85.9
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 179
136% 178 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 107%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
182GB free
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 345 389 402 397 397 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 462
Write 373
Mixed 388
SusWrite 364
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 21.2
89% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 42.2
94% 191 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 100%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 500GB
302GB free
Firmware: 0103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 81.5
Write 70.3
Mixed 56
52% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 60%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 2TB
474GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 44 45 45 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 142
Write 38.5
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 43.2
50% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 80%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 44 45 45 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 144
Write 141
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 43.2
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 76%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 43 44 45 45 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 97.5
Write 98.3
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 43.2
56% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 45%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
3.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 103 104 103 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 139
Write 130
Mixed 62
SusWrite 103
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
284% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 802C0000802C 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 0198 9905471-073.A00LF 0198 9905471-073.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.8
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.9
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 5040 Builds (Compare 1,831 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 5040

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback