Asus P5KPL-AM SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM SE  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100820
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateMar 04 '17 at 05:45
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 74.3
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 81.6
43% 64.8 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 160
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 127GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1126F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57% Above average
Read 253
Write 241
Mixed 249
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 17.6
99% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 33.8
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 17.5
28% 51.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57%
Great: 89%
ASMT 2115 320GB
298GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 79.7
Write 78.2
Mixed 81.4
103% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.16
55% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.2
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-AM SE Builds (Compare 403 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback