To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 0.03125 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160809
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 27 '20 at 19:03
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 50.1
2-Core 101
34% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 199
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 38% Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1180 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.6% Average
Lighting 61.1
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 71.6
50% 64.1 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 57.1
Splatting 51.9
46% 57.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$265
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 185 198 153 170 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.6% Average
Read 177
Write 200
Mixed 179
SusWrite 178
42% 184 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 28.4
90% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 28.2
DQ Write 69.9
DQ Mixed 39.3
33% 45.8 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 135%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB
741GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 15 19 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 23.8
Write 21.1
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 21.9
17% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback