Lenovo 4524CG9

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 4524CG9 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO
Memory	2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121016
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '20 at 14:57
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 84.6 2-Core 156 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 280 34% 264 Pts	64-Core 270 17% 270 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220 19,671 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 2.27 Parallax 0.91 2% 1.69 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 1.83 Splatting 2.61 2% 2.58 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X2512G 512GB 14,867 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 315GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1022A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 165 88 89 87 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 407 Write 314 Mixed 304 SusWrite 138 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 49.7 4K Mixed 16.3 72% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 29.1 82% 170 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 180GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 94 94 93 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 61.5 Write 45.2 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 92.6 45% 60.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 86GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 119 121 121 121 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 108 Write 112 Mixed 66 SusWrite 120 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$63 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 121GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 95 95 95 94 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 89.3 Write 86.8 Mixed 48.3 SusWrite 94 58% 79.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 57%
Seagate Desktop 1TB 4,684 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 110GB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 30 Write 21.8 Mixed 20 SusWrite 19.1 30% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 21%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 500GB 3,970 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 54GB free, PID 5031 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 19 19 18 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.7% Terrible	Read 29.3 Write 20.7 Mixed 15.5 SusWrite 18.7 27% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 33% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.7% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMR1870EF48E8W1333 4x2GB 257 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	47.3% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.7 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 13.1 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 4524CG9

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)