Supermicro C9Z390-CGW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro C9Z390-CGW  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C9Z390-CGW
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191118
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateJun 26 '20 at 19:42
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$250
CPU, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 149
2-Core 308
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 1,185
104% 881 Pts
64-Core 1,194
74% 1,194 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
MSI(1462 C75C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 123
Parallax 136
103% 128 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 124
Splatting 100
105% 134 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,301
Write 57.4
Mixed 115
517% 2,491 MB/s
4K Read 870
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 7.2
1,329% 293 MB/s
Poor: 89% Great: 133%
Seagate ST16000VE000-2L2103 16TB
10TB free
Firmware: EV02
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 7,410
Write 56
Mixed 62.9
1,795% 2,510 MB/s
4K Read 966
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4.3
40,768% 324 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$139
9TB free
Firmware: SC60
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 208
Write 210
Mixed 91.9
125% 170 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.3
527% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill F4-2666C19-16GIS 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93.1% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 29.3
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 27.5
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C9Z390-CGW Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Supermicro C9Z390-CGW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $521
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback