Supermicro C9Z390-CGW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro C9Z390-CGW  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C9Z390-CGW
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191118
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateJun 26 '20 at 08:59
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$205
CPU, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 152
2-Core 305
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 1185
106% 893 Pts
64-Core 1,191
74% 1,191 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
MSI(1462 C75C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 125
Parallax 138
103% 130 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 124
Splatting 102
106% 135 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 5.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 89% Great: 133%
Seagate ST16000VE000-2L2103 16TB
10TB free
Firmware: EV02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 37 44 42 46 54 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$196
9TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 212 213 213 210 212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 214
Write 207
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 212
133% 182 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1.1
530% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 123%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill F4-2666C19-16GIS 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.8% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 28.9
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 27
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C9Z390-CGW Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Supermicro C9Z390-CGW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $521
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback