Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167 23,407 User benchmarks, average bench 39% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	39.2% Below average	Memory 59.6 1-Core 48.1 2-Core 77.2 40% 61.6 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 127 15% 117 Pts	64-Core 130 8% 130 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 0456) 1.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.78% Terrible	Lighting 0.83 Reflection 1.08 Parallax 0.81 1% 0.91 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.52 1% 1.16 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.78% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 63 84 109 50 23 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.4% Below average	Read 214 Write 198 Mixed 174 SusWrite 72.7 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 13.9 4K Mixed 15.3 50% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 125 108% 160 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 80CE M471B2873FHS-CH9 3GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.8% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.33 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 5.1 13% 4.67 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	103x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	10x
Mobility Radeon HD 4650ATIBench 3%, 4,405 samples	3x

RAM
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples	10x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	10x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	7x

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $188