Lenovo 2118CJG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2118CJG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130307
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMar 03 '17 at 10:34
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 91
2-Core 169
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 222
31% 227 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3093) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2867
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.59% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 1.62
Parallax 1.31
1% 1.52 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 1
Splatting 3.22
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.59%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 100
Mixed 55.5
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.24
79% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 63%
WDC WD12 00BEVS-22UST0 120GB
22GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.9% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 25
Mixed 5.73
23% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.23
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.7% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback