Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-R R2.0  (all builds)
Memory18.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180914
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 25 '20 at 18:43
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 88.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 222
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 732
77% 617 Pts
64-Core 732
45% 732 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.9% Average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 76.8
49% 67.6 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 53.1
48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 99 118 110 116 110 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
84.2% Excellent
Read 227
Write 272
Mixed 103
SusWrite 119
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 53.3
167% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 247
210% 308 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 111%
Apacer AS350 240GB
6GB free
Firmware: R0818A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 449
Write 384
Mixed 316
85% 383 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 25.5
136% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 33.3
68% 133 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 99%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$159
28GB free
Firmware: CC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 106 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 106
Write 103
Mixed 62
SusWrite 105
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 73%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB
66GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 22 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 40.7
Write 39.7
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 21.4
26% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 81%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB
76GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 21 22 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 41.5
Write 41.8
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 21.5
25% 34 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
117GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 92 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 122
Write 106
Mixed 68
SusWrite 94.1
72% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
82GB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 34.7
Write 41.5
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 42.6
28% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
186% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD4AGU88C-26N190A Adata 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.7% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 17.4
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-R R2.0 Builds (Compare 4,243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback