Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '20 at 16:49
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 187
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 483
53% 420 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.2% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 116
Parallax 94.4
82% 104 fps
MRender 98.8
Gravity 96.1
Splatting 103
82% 99.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 520ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 151 146 161 152 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 321
Write 277
Mixed 258
SusWrite 156
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 27.5
100% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 216
170% 237 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
555GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 159 164 163 165 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 171
Mixed 87.9
SusWrite 162
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.3
254% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 103%
Great: 109%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$99
811GB free
Firmware: 01.01M02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 174 172 169 173 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 148
Write 150
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 172
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.8
222% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
V01D3LF4GB26826813 8634 SUPERTALENT02 8634 SUPERTALENT02 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 17.2
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $902
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback