Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za) 2,382 User benchmarks, average bench 24% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Memory 53.4 1-Core 18.2 2-Core 29.7 25% 33.8 Pts	4-Core 33.7 8-Core 35.1 5% 34.4 Pts	64-Core 36.9 2% 36.9 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 35%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1637GSX 160GB-$4 1,633 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: DL030M SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 38 35 39 38 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	23% Poor	Read 42.3 Write 43.7 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 37.7 27% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Smart SH564568FH8NWLCSFR 2x2GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 5 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 3.5 8% 2.97 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 24%, 2,382 samples	25x
E2-2000 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 27%, 927 samples	14x

GPU
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	25x
Radeon HD 7340AMDBench 1%, 3,203 samples	14x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	1x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
KP330 120GBKingbankBench 63%, 173 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,473 samples	4x
SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 1x4GBSmartBench 27%, 754 samples	3x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 5,120 samples	2x

Value: 10% - Terrible

Total price: $89

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16