Asus V221IC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus V221IC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK V221IC
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 25 '20 at 02:48
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100U
BGA1356, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 126
56% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 199
28% 204 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 930MX
Asus(1043 1730) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8846
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
8.27% Terrible
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 8.42
Parallax 9.28
9% 9.75 fps
MRender 5.29
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 6.83
6% 7.45 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.27%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar SSD 256GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 129 137 139 129 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 420
Write 397
Mixed 259
SusWrite 153
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 16
46% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 33.1
69% 139 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 110%
JMicron Generic DISK00 240GB
148GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 40 41 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 39.8
Write 39.3
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 39.5
54% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 9.1
854% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 10.8
DQ Write 19.3
DQ Mixed 11.1
1,074% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.6% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 10
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical V221IC Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus V221IC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback