HP h8-1234

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP h8-1234  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 2AC8
Memory19.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '20 at 22:33
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6120 Six-Core
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 41
2-Core 111
47% 75.5 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 240
28% 215 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.1
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.4% Average
Lighting 56.1
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 82.6
46% 67.6 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 60
Splatting 53.4
48% 59.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 EVO 250G 249GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 32 18 22 21 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 423
Write 339
Mixed 293
SusWrite 57
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 16.1
77% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 34.9
DQ Write 40.2
DQ Mixed 44.8
32% 40 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 71%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 163 167 161 166 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 171
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 163
95% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8GX CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8GX 24GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.4% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11.4
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1234 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1234

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $102
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback