Gigabyte GA-H77-D3H-MVP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics92.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77-D3H-MVP  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJun 24 '20 at 16:01
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 141
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 393
43% 340 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 450.82
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.4% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 136
Parallax 130
94% 127 fps
MRender 98.3
Gravity 125
Splatting 105
90% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370 256GB-$110
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0815B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 290 227 235 234 241 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 457
Write 292
Mixed 295
SusWrite 245
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 25.1
85% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 188
168% 252 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 96%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 172 171 172 168 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 186
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 171
104% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 04CD F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 859B CT102464BA160B.M16 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.7% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H77-D3H-MVP Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77-D3H-MVP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $367
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback