Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 220 5,045 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 56.4 1-Core 34.5 2-Core 58.4 33% 49.8 Pts	4-Core 60.4 8-Core 59.5 8% 60 Pts	64-Core 63 4% 63 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics 21,841 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2AA9) 256MB Driver: atiu9p64 aticfx64 atiu9pag aticfx32 atiumd64 atidxx64 atiumdag atidxx32 atiumdva atiumd6a atitmm64 Ver. 8.702.0.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.41% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.31 0% 0.61 fps	MRender 0.76 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 1 0% 0.65 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.41% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 433GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 38 37 36 38 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	25.6% Poor	Read 54.5 Write 52.3 Mixed 38 SusWrite 34.6 33% 44.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 5GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 1024, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 6 17% 5.9 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 5.1 13% 4.5 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16