Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141202
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 24 '20 at 01:19
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 135
60% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 358
35% 287 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
Asus(1043 8388) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 1.13
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.49%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 145 130 127 125 129 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.9% Average
Read 152
Write 147
Mixed 158
SusWrite 131
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 24.3
82% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 32.8
DQ Write 64.3
DQ Mixed 42.7
34% 46.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60
646GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 81 80 82 77 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 151
Write 102
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 78.5
67% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 96%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
2TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 81 80 83 77 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 158
Write 150
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 78.6
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
269% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 104%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
487GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 46 48 45 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 92.7
Write 84.6
Mixed 41.9
SusWrite 46.2
85% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 43%
TOSHIBA HDWE140 4TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 14 14 16 15 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 157
Write 153
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 14.9
112% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 70%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
643GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 12 13 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 120
Write 152
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 11.3
95% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.5
230% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 61%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
724GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 68 68 67 65 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 139
Write 146
Mixed 86.6
SusWrite 66.7
143% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
41% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 54%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 50 51 52 49 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 115
Write 111
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 49.9
113% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
130% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 67%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
299GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 6.9 5.6 5.4 7.5 6.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 112
Write 111
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 6.5
81% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24%
Great: 67%
TOSHIBA HDWE150 5TB
4.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 72 71 72 69 74 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.3% Above average
Read 202
Write 198
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 70.7
170% 135 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 7.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 77%
ST375052 8AS 750GB
456GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 13 13 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.8% Very poor
Read 93.3
Write 88.6
Mixed 61.4
SusWrite 12.4
81% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 14.8
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback