ADD TO PC
BUILD

Emachines EL1320

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Emachines EL1320 (all builds)
Motherboard	eMachines EMCP61M
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090805
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '20 at 21:42
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon LE-1660 177 User benchmarks, average bench 35% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Memory 71.4 1-Core 39.9 2-Core 40.8 38% 50.7 Pts	4-Core 40.9 8-Core 40.9 5% 40.9 Pts	64-Core 41.2 2% 41.2 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 4,836 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 0301) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$32 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z320 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 65 63 50 78 77 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.3% Poor	Read 243 Write 60 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 62.3 23% 107 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 10 35% 8.67 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 86%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54 24,309 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 167GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 75 79 81 79 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 51.5 Write 80.8 Mixed 45.5 SusWrite 78.6 47% 64.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GU342G0ALEPR692C6F 1x2GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 400 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 4.7 14% 4.9 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.57 GB/s	Latency 98.1 41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 18%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback