Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-DS3P  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '20 at 10:09
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 137
60% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 314
35% 276 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1304 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.9% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 50.7
33% 44.6 fps
MRender 57.7
Gravity 44.8
Splatting 39.6
38% 47.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Sol id State Disk 240GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 560A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 103 119 128 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 316
Write 206
Mixed 241
SusWrite 126
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 25.4
73% 18.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
238GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 113 111 112 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 113
Write 104
Mixed 71
SusWrite 112
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95
73GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 83 81 81 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 90.5
Write 94.3
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 83.1
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
158GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 143 143 145 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 182
Mixed 127
SusWrite 144
117% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
189% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 109%
ADATA XPG EX500 500GB
32GB free, PID a73a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 61 61 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 60.8
102% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.2% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 16.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11.1
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-DS3P Builds (Compare 3,200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback