Asrock H87 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H87 Performance  (all builds)
Memory19.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160114
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 23 '20 at 01:01
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 59%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 211
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 386
51% 380 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2312) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Lighting 65.3
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 76.9
53% 57.5 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 61.1
Splatting 54.2
48% 59.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA250CM10002 250GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 231 145 247 183 276 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 103
Write 414
Mixed 392
SusWrite 214
64% 280 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 39.6
141% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 115
140% 249 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 104%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
258GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 46 46 47 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 59.3
Write 59.8
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 46.4
38% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
106GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 146 145 147 145 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 145
Write 145
Mixed 103
SusWrite 146
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 101%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
86GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 179 178 179 181 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 143
Mixed 59
SusWrite 179
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.4
418% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
9GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 71 77 71 74 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 71
Write 73.7
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 79.2
50% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
1GB free
Firmware: 0604
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.2
Write 35.8
Mixed 29
26% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 104%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 500GB
25GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 41 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 36.5
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 40.9
48% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 41%
WD My Book 25EE 3TB
5GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 97.7
Write 98.7
Mixed 79.2
117% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 91%
WDC WD10 EZEX-75WN4A0 1TB
113GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 95 96 99 99 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.4% Average
Read 108
Write 104
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 92.9
130% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
107% 1.43 MB/s
ST1000DM 003-1ER162 1TB
36GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 97 98 99 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
50% Average
Read 157
Write 122
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 95.6
146% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 50%
Great: 72%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
66GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 15 4.4 4.8 1 3.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 114
Write 114
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 6.5
92% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8GX Transcend TS1GLK72V3H KHX1600C10D3/8GX Transcend TS1GLK72V3H 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.7% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87 Performance Builds (Compare 479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H87 Performance - $141

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback