MSI MS-16P8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GL63 8RCS
MotherboardMSI MS-16P8  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime7.3 Days
Run DateJun 22 '20 at 17:36
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 28.9
2-Core 52.1
33% 47.6 Pts
4-Core 97.9
8-Core 255
20% 176 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
MSI(1462 127D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3184
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 34
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 33.4
28% 30.7 fps
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 23
24% 27.8 fps
Poor: 19% Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 199 211 213 216 218 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 382
Write 570
Mixed 542
SusWrite 248
99% 435 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 15.3
49% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 274
202% 268 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 126%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
795GB free
Firmware: SBM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 101 103 104 99 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 49
Write 80.5
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 100
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.2
111% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
25.4% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P8 Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback