ECS Z97-MACHINE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardECS Z97-MACHINE  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '20 at 01:50
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 208
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 564
59% 473 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 1757 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Lighting 44.1
Reflection 41.6
Parallax 54.6
36% 46.8 fps
MRender 56.4
Gravity 51.3
Splatting 38.9
39% 48.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 256 245 215 194 180 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 423
Write 275
Mixed 285
SusWrite 224
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 30.4
107% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 182
164% 249 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 91%
Crucial MTFDDAV256TBN-1AR15ABHA 256GB
46GB free
Firmware: HPC0T14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 460 451 431 417 423 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 413
Write 153
Mixed 225
SusWrite 438
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 36.2
128% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 304
220% 282 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 0215 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
40.9% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 10.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 11
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-MACHINE Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: ECS Z97-MACHINE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $483
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback