Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S7  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3099-A1
Memory93.4 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '20 at 16:31
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2420 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 46.5
1-Core 34.3
2-Core 82
33% 54.3 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 348
32% 271 Pts
64-Core 889
55% 889 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR SAS 6G 1GB
534GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 278 281 281 279 281 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.5% Below average
Read 272
Write 267
Mixed 103
SusWrite 280
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 1.8
8% 3.6 MB/s
LSI MR SAS 6G 1GB
836GB free
Firmware: 3.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 70 71 70 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.9% Poor
Read 437
Write 70.3
Mixed 86
SusWrite 70.6
36% 166 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.3
7% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 30%
LSI MR SAS 6G 1GB
238GB free
Firmware: 3.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 11 9.2 3.2 13 3.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70EB0- 6x16GB
6 of 12 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.6% Above average
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 23.7
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 2.9
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIMERGY TX200 S7 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback