MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200423
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 21 '20 at 00:40
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 78.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 248
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 805
78% 640 Pts
64-Core 1,311
81% 1,311 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.10.16
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 54.6
Reflection 62.3
Parallax 70.5
44% 62.5 fps
Gravity 54.5
Splatting 53.4
48% 53.9 fps
Poor: 37% Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S5 256GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9001b31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 703 749 746 177 265 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1921
Write 729
Mixed 785
SusWrite 464
214% 975 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 50.6
180% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 504
DQ Mixed 459
337% 433 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 179%
Great: 241%
OCZ Vertex 460 120GB-$200
78GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 405 403 409 408 404 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 439
Write 404
Mixed 334
SusWrite 402
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 30.5
106% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 209
156% 210 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
100GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 99 99 98 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 87
Write 75
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 98.3
58% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 70%
Maxtor 7L320S0 324GB
124GB free
Firmware: BANC1G10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 53 51 53 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
30% Below average
Read 51.5
Write 53.2
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 52
35% 48 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.8
185% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30%
Great: 37%
Lio-org FILEIO 64GB
15GB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.1 3 3 2.7 2.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Read 8.3
Write 2
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 2.9
4% 4.62 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 29.9
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 25.4
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,739
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback