ASRock Z170 GAMING K6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardASRock Z170 GAMING K6  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '20 at 19:15
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 251
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 726
73% 592 Pts
64-Core 731
45% 731 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2189 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 119
Parallax 103
95% 113 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 103
Splatting 105
85% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
610GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 819 406 407 408 408 409 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Crucial M4 512GB-$74
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 208 255 214 215 254 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 484
Write 245
Mixed 278
SusWrite 228
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 25.3
117% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 64.3
DQ Mixed 51.6
49% 78.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 81%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
2TB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 489 478 476 479 479 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 456
Mixed 372
SusWrite 481
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 50.1
176% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 361
272% 365 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 120%
Great: 122%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
695GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 161 145 138 135 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 153
Write 134
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 147
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 107%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 300GB
197GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 5.6 5.9 5.8 5.7 5.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 40.4
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 5.8
23% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 48%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
516GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 132 132 134 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 142
Write 122
Mixed 88
SusWrite 134
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.4
267% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 80%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 5.6 5.9 5.8 5.7 5.6 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 38
Write 41
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 5.8
22% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 53%
WD My Book 1235 4TB
2TB free, PID 1235
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 35
Write 29.5
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 10.5
34% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 59%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 34.7
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 10.6
35% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 42%
WD Elements 500GB
393GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 35.4
Write 32.9
Mixed 26
SusWrite 10.5
34% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.4% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 21.6
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 25.8
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 Gaming K6 Builds (Compare 371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: ASRock Z170 GAMING K6 - $267

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $850
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback