Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FB_X512FB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FB_X512FB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FB
Memory3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190402
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJun 20 '20 at 17:57
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 74.2
2-Core 148
60% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 147
20% 146 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1DFE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7063
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.78% Terrible
Lighting 6.43
Reflection 8.69
Parallax 6.97
5% 7.36 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 7.03
Splatting 15.1
10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.78%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3512GJ 512GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 180 100 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 433
Write 168
Mixed 310
SusWrite 161
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 32.1
113% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 210
177% 254 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 22.1
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FB_X512FB Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FB_X512FB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback