Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory41.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '20 at 11:58
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 293
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1,010
98% 803 Pts
64-Core 1,649
102% 1,649 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 446.14
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 182
Reflection 195
Parallax 175
148% 184 fps
Gravity 184
Splatting 124
132% 154 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
243GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 463 460 462 466 468 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 463
Mixed 439
SusWrite 464
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 50.9
166% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 289
237% 337 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 117%
Great: 125%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
23GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 483
Write 479
Mixed 298
93% 420 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 48.2
170% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 170
179% 294 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
77GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 467 469 467 473 434 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 452
Mixed 440
SusWrite 463
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 51.5
166% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 294
239% 338 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 117%
Great: 125%
Toshiba MD04ACA200 2TB
32GB free
Firmware: FP1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 98 100 99 102 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 92.5
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 101
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
15GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 111 116 108 104 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 69
SusWrite 108
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 48GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 29.7
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 41.6
SC Mixed 30.4
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 56.4
71% 56.4 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,070
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback