| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 72.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z68M-D2H (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110720 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 20 '20 at 02:23 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | JPN-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.65 GHz (avg)
|
83.9%
Excellent
|
81% 141 Pts
|
62% 496 Pts
|
35% 570 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1586 MHz, MLim: 1780 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
72.6%
Very good
|
70% 84.8 fps
|
77% 95.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
266GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 81 81 82 81 MB/s
|
44.6%
Average
|
49% 65.8 MB/s
|
171% 1.33 MB/s
| |
|
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 92 94 91 96 MB/s
|
50.6%
Above average
|
57% 77.9 MB/s
|
155% 1.17 MB/s
| |
|
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
394GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 21 21 21 MB/s
|
9.46%
Terrible
|
27% 19.9 MB/s
|
40% 0.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.4%
Average
|
46% 16.2 GB/s
|
44% 15.4 GB/s
|
62% 64.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-Z68M-D2H Builds (Compare 144 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68M-D2H
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 26x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 21x |
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 14x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 8x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 8x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |