Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 165%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive538% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE  (all builds)
Memory29.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '20 at 09:50
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KS
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 163
2-Core 326
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 1,301
115% 976 Pts
64-Core 1,725
107% 1,725 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 110%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 3762) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 3058 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 450.82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Lighting 210
Reflection 218
Parallax 222
171% 217 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 204
Splatting 136
128% 159 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 145%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0435 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1715 1913 1961 1971 1927 1997 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
538% Outstanding
Read 2,321
Write 1,944
Mixed 2,122
SusWrite 1,914
467% 2,075 MB/s
4K Read 273
4K Write 239
4K Mixed 254
866% 255 MB/s
DQ Read 1,463
DQ Write 1,230
DQ Mixed 1329
1,000% 1,341 MB/s
Poor: 302%
This bench: 538%
Great: 559%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
397GB free
Firmware: CXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1802 1801 1804 1803 1803 1737 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 2,179
Write 1,584
Mixed 719
SusWrite 1,792
350% 1,568 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 84.3
310% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,314
DQ Write 1,247
DQ Mixed 645
658% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 349%
Great: 306%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
273GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1546 1255 1246 1246 1249 1252 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
362% Outstanding
Read 2,585
Write 2,397
Mixed 1,659
SusWrite 1,299
444% 1,985 MB/s
4K Read 73.2
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 107
376% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,524
DQ Write 1,311
DQ Mixed 1,424
1,065% 1,420 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 362%
Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 215 216 216 215 216 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 166
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 212
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 119%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 46.2
MC Write 46.6
MC Mixed 34.7
121% 42.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 55.2
SC Mixed 35.3
109% 38.3 GB/s
Latency 49.5
81% 49.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 120%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE Builds (Compare 1,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE - $759

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,805
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback