Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 168%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive541% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE  (all builds)
Memory29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '20 at 19:30
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KS
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 166
2-Core 332
108% 199 Pts
4-Core 665
8-Core 1,326
117% 995 Pts
64-Core 1,770
110% 1,770 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 111%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 3762) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 3058 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 450.82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Lighting 209
Reflection 217
Parallax 222
171% 216 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 204
Splatting 136
129% 159 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 145%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0435 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1893 1934 1959 1969 1954 1815 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
541% Outstanding
Read 2,324
Write 1,931
Mixed 2,104
SusWrite 1,921
466% 2,070 MB/s
4K Read 276
4K Write 241
4K Mixed 256
874% 258 MB/s
DQ Read 1,464
DQ Write 1,239
DQ Mixed 1,331
1,003% 1,345 MB/s
Poor: 302%
This bench: 541%
Great: 559%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
397GB free
Firmware: CXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1791 1781 1779 1780 1777 1712 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
347% Outstanding
Read 2,151
Write 1,554
Mixed 928
SusWrite 1770
358% 1,601 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 222
4K Mixed 84.8
314% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,308
DQ Write 1255
DQ Mixed 635
654% 1,066 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 347%
Great: 306%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
274GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1555 1245 1249 1247 1244 1250 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
365% Outstanding
Read 2,582
Write 2,417
Mixed 1,680
SusWrite 1,298
447% 1,994 MB/s
4K Read 73.5
4K Write 244
4K Mixed 109
380% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 1,568
DQ Write 1,341
DQ Mixed 1,448
1,087% 1,452 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 365%
Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 213 215 216 214 215 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 213
Write 174
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 212
126% 172 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 122%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 29.9
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 46.4
SC Mixed 33.1
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 49.3
81% 49.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 105%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE Builds (Compare 1,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE - $759

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,805
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback