Sony VPCEK20AL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSony VPCEK20AL  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '20 at 04:10
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Memory 50.6
1-Core 17.4
2-Core 33.4
25% 33.8 Pts
4-Core 34.4
8-Core 34.5
5% 34.5 Pts
64-Core 34.1
2% 34.1 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
Sony(104D 908D) 384MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 12.104.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.96
Parallax 0.75
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.53
Splatting 1.04
1% 0.84 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 49 49 49 49 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 335
Write 238
Mixed 239
SusWrite 54.1
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 21.7
4K Mixed 17.3
56% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 73
DQ Write 58.5
DQ Mixed 41.7
38% 57.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 85%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
16GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 7.9 8.8 9 8.4 9.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
7.32% Terrible
Read 28.1
Write 1
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 8.7
14% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.4
64% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.32%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD7YG1B1674EG Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.9% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 4.7
11% 3.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3.5
8% 2.8 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 12%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCEK20AL Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCEK20AL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback