Aftershock NH5xAx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAftershock NH5xAx  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock NH5xAx
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200311
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 17 '20 at 12:27
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 74.8
1-Core 143
2-Core 285
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 784
78% 635 Pts
64-Core 1,020
63% 1,020 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 50F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.8% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 119
Parallax 113
92% 115 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 104
Splatting 93.2
89% 111 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
833GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 969 1029 1035 994 983 997 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,148
Write 920
Mixed 1,065
SusWrite 1,001
233% 1,034 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 76.7
247% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,206
DQ Write 1,068
DQ Mixed 1,072
821% 1,115 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 235%
Great: 355%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 116 119 119 119 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GS88C-26N1900 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
75.5% Very good
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 29.4
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 28.9
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NH5xAx Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

System: Aftershock NH5xAx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback