Aftershock NH5xAx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics49.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAftershock NH5xAx  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock NH5xAx
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '20 at 11:25
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 0.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 38.4
2-Core 57.4
39% 55.5 Pts
4-Core 54.8
8-Core 80.6
8% 67.7 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 50F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.2% Average
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 118
27% 64.4 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 107
Splatting 97.7
92% 115 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
842GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 634 930 1080 1027 970 1012 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 899
Write 492
Mixed 890
SusWrite 942
181% 806 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 56.7
186% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 136
104% 142 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 158%
Great: 355%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 117 119 118 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 173
Write 120
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 118
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.8
200% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GS88C-26N1900 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 23.4
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 11.2
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NH5xAx Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

System: Aftershock NH5xAx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback