Dell System XPS L702X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell System XPS L702X  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XN71K
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110601
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 16 '20 at 21:52
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 50.9
2-Core 94.9
50% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 252
26% 212 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
Dell(1028 04B8) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3489
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.14% Terrible
Lighting 5.73
Reflection 6.85
Parallax 4.84
5% 5.81 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 5.83
Splatting 8.13
6% 7.32 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.14%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,326
Write 2,889
Mixed 2,922
679% 3,046 MB/s
4K Read 265
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 152
670% 185 MB/s
DQ Read 605
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 187
211% 367 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Hitachi HTS541060G9SA00 60GB
48GB free
Firmware: MB3O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 27 28 27 28 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 27.5
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 27.7
18% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
37.6% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 12
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical System XPS L702X Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell System XPS L702X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback