Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '20 at 07:38
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 568
63% 498 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 139
Parallax 120
106% 130 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 129
Splatting 102
92% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 580 427 294 324 355 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB
22GB free
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 97 93 92 51 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44% Average
Read 154
Write 118
Mixed 138
SusWrite 86
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 23.8
87% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 107
86% 122 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 44%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 168 171 176 177 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 138
Write 153
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 174
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.8
256% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 90%
Patriot Blaze 120GB
106GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 51 26 39 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
127% Outstanding
Read 307
Write 77
Mixed 96.3
SusWrite 42.2
137% 131 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 3.8
962% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 0
DQ Write 30.7
DQ Mixed 7.8
1,310% 12.8 MB/s
BUFFALO External HDD USB Device (TurboPC) 2TB
697GB free, PID 01f0
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 154 158 160 161 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 134
Write 101
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 157
159% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 194%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBSR KHX1866C9D3/4GX 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 16GB
1800, 1800, 1800, 1800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.3% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 20.5
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 22
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback