Dell Studio XPS 435MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDell Studio XPS 435MT  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0R849J
Memory2.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '20 at 15:13
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 126
60% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 297
32% 254 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
MSI(1462 809F) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.75
2% 2.14 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 1.74
2% 2.04 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 205 212 211 211 211 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50% Average
Read 226
Write 213
Mixed 192
SusWrite 210
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 24.3
84% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 64.6
DQ Mixed 31.1
28% 40 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 52 52 52 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 91
Write 94.5
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 50.6
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
263GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 73 75 76 74 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
40% Below average
Read 65
Write 72
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 73.9
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40%
Great: 69%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-75A7B0 500GB
175GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.9 6 6 5.9 8.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
2.57% Terrible
Read 6
Write 5.3
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 6.3
8% 5.85 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.57%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x1GB
6 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.5% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 15.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 11.2
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435MT Builds (Compare 323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 435MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $184
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback