Asus X99-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-E  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '20 at 12:03
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 235
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 739
73% 598 Pts
64-Core 950
59% 950 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 17
Parallax 20.1
18% 19.9 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 16.9
17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 436 439 442 441 440 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 436
Mixed 355
SusWrite 436
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 38.4
127% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 122
122% 196 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2666C15 CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2666C15 CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2666C15 CMK16GX4M4A2666C16 CMK16GX4M4A2666C15 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 46.5
MC Write 59.5
MC Mixed 48.1
147% 51.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 22.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 59.3
68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 118%
This bench: 130%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $398
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback